Kerala stands apart from the rest
This weeks Outlook magazine had a special coverage on the southern states of India, on how they fare well in comparison to other states (mainly North Indians states) of India. The results hardly surprise anyone, because the north south differences in terms of human development (not in terms of the urban prosperity and stock market index) is quite wide. But among southern states itself, the little Kerala stands way apart in almost all of the development index. This can be confusing to many, because the perception many have about Kerala is one that of an industry freed and unemployment sprouting region. It is no denying fact that, Kerala's main problem over the years have been unemployment, mainly because of the lack of private industries. But, I am interested to see how an ordinary human being living in a remote village fares. Is he able to live a decent life, freed of violence and exploitation? Is he in a position to support his/her children's education? Does he find comfort in himself or herself within the social circle? Can he afford a house? Do they access to other basic needs of life? Is he getting basic medical/health support from Government? As far as I am concerned, these should judge the well being of a state, because that is the best index of its people.
Not surprisingly, Kerala is miles apart from the other states, in all of these. It would not offer any surprise to anyone who lived in Kerala. I must confess that, the left policies over the years helped in drafting a grass root level development program emphasizing on such welfare based indexes. Eduction reforms, health reforms, land reforms and even the literacy drive all are massive programs initiated by the left governments in Kerala.
See the statistics from [1]
Also A Head For Numbers
The South is streets ahead. They earn more, they live well and they feel better too.
[1]http://www.outlookindia.com/full.asp?fodname=20070716&fname=HThe+Stats&sid=1
Not surprisingly, Kerala is miles apart from the other states, in all of these. It would not offer any surprise to anyone who lived in Kerala. I must confess that, the left policies over the years helped in drafting a grass root level development program emphasizing on such welfare based indexes. Eduction reforms, health reforms, land reforms and even the literacy drive all are massive programs initiated by the left governments in Kerala.
See the statistics from [1]
Also A Head For Numbers
The South is streets ahead. They earn more, they live well and they feel better too.
conomic Indicators | |||||||
Karnataka, 7.2%, tops growth | A.P | T.N | Kerala | Karnataka | INDIA | U.P# | Gujarat |
Per capita net state domestic product (SDP) in Rs (2004-05) | 23,153 | 25,965 | 27,048 | 23,945 | 23,222 | 11,477 | 28,355 |
Percentage share in total FDI approved (1991-03) | 4.61 | 8.53 | 0.53 | 8.25 | NA | 1.69 | 6.47 |
Average annual growth of state domestic product in per cent (1993-94 to 2003-04)** | 5.5 | 4.7 | 5.0 | 7.2 | 5.6* | 3.2 | 5.7 |
Per capita SDP in per cent (1993-94 to 2003-04)** | 4.4 | 3.7 | 4.1 | 5.7 | 3.8* | 0.9 | 3.6 |
Percentage of population below poverty line (1999-00) | 15.77 | 21.12 | 12.72 | 20.04 | 26.10 | 31.15 | 14.07 |
Range of min wages for unskilled workers in Rs (2005) | 45-119 | 54-150 | 72-189 | 63-103 | 61-115 | 57-110 | 50-99 |
Job-seekers registered with employment exchanges in thousands (2003) | 2674.3 | 5006.4 | 3635.1 | 1784.3 | 41388.7 | 1927.8 | 998.1 |
Percentage employment share (public/private, 2001-02) | 71.3/28.7 | 64.1/35.9 | 52.8/47.2 | 58.7/41.3 | 69.0/31.0 | 79/21 | 53.6/46.4 |
Percentage of urban population (2001) | 27.30 | 44.04 | 25.96 | 33.99 | 27.81 | 20.78 | 37.36 |
*at constant (1990-00) prices between 1999-00 and 2003-04 **at constant (1993-94) prices #Includes Uttarakhand in data from 2000-01 and earlier | |||||||
How Women-Friendly? | |||||||
In TN, 69.2% have a say in family matters | A.P | T.N | Kerala | Karnataka | INDIA | U.P | Gujarat |
No. of females per 1,000 males (’01 census) | 978 | 987 | 1058 | 965 | 933 | 898 | 920 |
Juvenile (0-6) sex ratio (2001) | 964 | 939 | 963 | 949 | 927 | 916 | 878 |
Mean age for marriage (2004) | 19.0 | 21.5 | 22.9 | 20.0 | 20.4 | 20.4 | 20.5 |
Female literacy rate (2001) | 50.4 | 64.4 | 87.7 | 56.9 | 53.7 | 42.2 | 57.8 |
Currently married women who usually participate in household decisions in per cent | 55.7 | 69.2 | 62.5 | 47.4 | 52.5 | 48.2 | 56.7 |
Women who have experienced spousal violence in per cent | 35.2 | 41.9 | 16.4 | 20.0 | 37.2 | 42.4 | 27.6 |
Percentage of women with more than 10 years of education | 22 | 32 | 49 | 28 | 22 | 18 | 24 |
Percentage of women’s employment to total employment (2003) | 20.5 | 30.2 | 39.3 | 31.2 | 18.1* | 9.8 | 12.7 |
* 2002 | |||||||
Others | |||||||
Less than 1% live in slums in Kerala | A.P | T.N | Kerala | Karnataka | INDIA | U.P | Gujarat |
Percentage with regular exposure to media (TV, radio, newspaper at least once a week) | 87 | 94 | 97 | 90 | 80 | 76 | 84 |
Percentage of slum population to total urban population (2001) | 24.9 | 10.4 | 0.8 | 7.8 | 15 | 12.70 | 9.90 |
Teledensity per 100 persons (May 2007) | 20.7 | 24.2* | 35.1 | 26.2 | 19.3 | 11.38 | 25.5 |
Total road length (km) per 100 sq km (2002) | 71.3 | 127.7 | 386.8 | 79.5 | 74.7 | 103.1 | 70.2 |
Voting percentage (2004 elections) | 69.95 | 60.8 | 71.45 | 65.1 | 58.1 | 48.16 | 45.2 |
* excluding Chennai | |||||||
Health | |||||||
In TN, 81% get vaccination | A.P | T.N | Kerala | Karnataka | INDIA | U.P | Gujarat |
Life expectancy at birth (1999-2003, M/F) | 62.2/64.8 | 64.3/66.5 | 70.9/76 | 62.9/66.4 | 61.8/63.5 | 59.6/58.7 | 62.5/64.6 |
Number of infant deaths per 1,000 live births in the last five years | 53 | 31 | 15 | 43 | 57 | 73 | 50 |
Institutional deliveries in the last three years in per cent | 69 | 90 | 100 | 67 | 41 | 22 | 55 |
Mothers who had at least three antenatal care visits for their last birth in per cent | 86.0 | 96.5 | 93.9 | 79.3 | 50.7 | 26.3 | 64.9 |
Vaccination coverage in per cent | 46 | 81 | 75 | 55 | 44 | 23 | 45 |
Children age 6-35 months who are anaemic in per cent | 79 | 72.5 | 55.7 | 82.7 | 79.2 | 85.1 | 80.1 |
Population served per government hospital bed | 2,351 | 849 | 1,172 | 1,321 | 2,257 | 5,646 | 1,544 |
Children under 3 who are underweight in per cent | 37 | 33 | 29 | 41 | 46 | 47 | 47 |
Per capita expenditure on health in Rs (2001-02) | 1,039 | 846 | 1,858 | 712 | 997 | 1,124 | 816 |
Unless specified, data in tables are the latest available, for 2005-06 | |||||||
Well-Being/Prosperity | |||||||
In Kerala, 84.1% live in pucca houses | A.P | T.N | Kerala | Karnataka | INDIA | U.P | Gujarat |
Percentage of households that: | |||||||
Have a television | 50.3 | 53.1 | 67.7 | 53.6 | 44.2 | 34 | 53.8 |
Have a motorised vehicle | 14.6 | 22.6 | 24.7 | 20.4 | 18.6 | 16.6 | 30.2 |
Live in a pucca house | 40.4 | 69.6 | 84.1 | 49.8 | 41.4 | 27.3 | 56.4 |
Have access to a toilet facility | 42.4 | 42.9 | 96 | 46.5 | 44.5 | 33.1 | 54.6 |
Use piped drinking water | 67.8 | 84.2 | 24.6 | 57.4 | 42.0 | 10.3 | 72.7 |
Have electricity | 88.4 | 88.6 | 91 | 89.3 | 67.9 | 42.8 | 89.3 |
Education | |||||||
100% transition to upper primary in TN | A.P | T.N | Kerala | Karnataka | U.P | Gujarat | |
Literacy rate (2001 census) | 60.5 | 73.5 | 90.9 | 66.6 | 56.3 | 69.1 | |
Percentage of schools with one teacher | 05.7 | 7.8 | 0.1 | 8.8 | 16.3 | 5.7 | |
No. of students for each teacher | 24.0 | 39 | 26 | 32 | 66 | 36 | |
Transition rate from primary to upper primary in per cent | 89.6 | 100.7* | 86.6 | 89.7 | 57.62 | 82.7 | |
Average classrooms in each school | 03.9 | 5.6 | 10.5 | 4.5 | 3.4 | 4.8 | |
Average number of instructional days | 212 | 217 | 181 | 225 | 194 | 210 | |
Percentage who go on to Grade V | 99.2 | 104.2* | 108.5* | 98.2 | 56.6 | 78.9 | |
Net primary enrolment ratio | 75.6 | 94.1 | 64.1 | 95.6 | 90 | 75.9 | |
Dropouts (Grade I-V) in per cent | 00.4 | -6.8* | 5.8 | 2.2 | 11.9 | 2.2 | |
* Indicates higher intake of students than dropouts | |||||||
Sources: Various central and state govt publications, including National Health Profile 2006, National Family Health Survey 2005-06 and State Report Cards 2005 of National Institute of Educational Planning and Administration |
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home